FINANCIAL FRAUD / WERE EMPLOYEES COMPLICIT?

Summary:

Fraud in financial institutions is particularly disturbing because those institutions generally have many procedures in place to prevent fraud. So, sometimes when money is missing, even though the leaders of the institution may suspect employee theft, it's not always the case. A New Orleans credit union had losses of over a million dollars from reclaimed Treasury checks deposited in a members account over the course of more than a year. The attorneys representing the credit union hired us to find out if any employees were complicit in this loss.

The Story:

A member of the credit union ran a business that cashed checks for people in a poor, immigrant neighborhood of the New Orleans metropolitan area. This member's business cashed many U.S. Treasury checks that were supposedly income tax refunds. Unbeknownst to the credit union staff at the time, a major scam was going on across the country with con artists stealing identities and then filing fraudulent tax returns with those stolen identities. The Treasury would issue the refund right away based on the fraudulent return, but when the IRS then discovered that the first return was fraudulent - usually after the real person whose identity was stolen filed their own tax return - the Treasury would send a notice to the financial institution to "reclaim" the check and the financial institution that cashed it would be liable for returning the money to the Treasury. (Treasury also reclaims social security checks issued in error after a person dies but before the department has been notified of the death. Those are generally referred to as "death reclamations" and are generally reimbursed by deducting from the account holder's account.)

At this particular large credit union, because con artists identified the member's check cashing business as an easy mark, there were many of these fraudulent Treasury checks that were cashed and then deposited in the member's account, totaling over a million dollars. When a few reclaimed checks came in, the credit union would notify the member that an amount was deducted from his account because of the bad checks and he would just bring in more checks to cover the amount deducted. Finally, however, he closed his account, but many more reclaimed checks from prior months kept coming in. Those checks weren't being covered and the credit union faced a mounting loss.

Needless to say, the credit union management and Board and their attorneys who were filing a bond claim wanted to know 1) Whether any credit union staff members were complicit in this loss? And 2) If staff members were not complicit, why didn't anyone figure out what was going on much earlier? We were brought in to do an investigation and attempt to answer those questions.

Joanne Parrent first did deep background investigations on all of the staff members who could have been complicit. She then flew to New Orleans to do in-depth interviews with the staff, as well as with the former member with the check cashing business.

She did not discover fraud. Instead she found that procedures were not followed correctly at the credit union, and that the accounting staff made serious mistakes. In particular, one lower level accounting staff member was responsible for the majority of the losses because she thought the reclamations were all death reclamations that would ultimately be reimbursed. She also did not put alerts on accounts when reclamations came in, a procedure that would have caught the problem earlier. Our report indicated that both her direct supervisor and the head of the accounting department were also remiss because they did not train and supervise her properly, either of which would have caught this problem earlier and limited the amount of the loss.

 

 

Copyright Notices © 2017 Parrent Smith Investigations and Research. All rights reserved.